Make vs n8n

Compare deployment responsibility and billing units before comparing headline prices.

Make site icon

When to explore Make

Explore Make for visual app-to-app scenarios; estimate actions executed per run.

Full profile ↗
n8n site icon

When to explore n8n

Explore n8n when execution-based cloud plans or a self-hosted deployment match your requirements.

Full profile ↗

Editorial guidance informed by official documentation · Checked 2026-11-06 · Not a hands-on ranking.

Decision pointMaken8n
Typical evaluationExplore visual app-to-app processes with clearly defined steps.Explore automation where deployment and workflow control matter.
Documented tasksBuild scenarios connecting apps and transforming data. Trigger workflows from events such as new records. Estimate consumption from the actions performed per run.Build workflows with integrations, AI nodes, and agent components. Evaluate execution-based cloud allowances. Consider self-hosting when you can operate the infrastructure.
PlatformsWebWeb, Self-hosted
Access & billingBilling uses credits. Most module actions consume one credit; some AI actions use more. Verify the current plan quote.Cloud Starter: €20/month billed annually, with 2,500 monthly workflow executions. Other plans and self-hosted deployments have different terms.
Important trade-offLoops and multiple records may create many billable actions per run.Self-hosting adds updates, monitoring, backup, and infrastructure responsibilities.
Hands-on resultNo LaunchGrow benchmark has been performed.No LaunchGrow benchmark has been performed.

Try the same task

Model one trigger, two integrations, validation, and a failure route. Test one and one hundred records. Include retries and approvals, then estimate vendor-specific billable units.

Sources

Prices, limits, and availability change. Check the linked product before buying.